Shandong: In 2020, all official vehicles of party and government organs will be equipped with new energy vehicles.

In 2020, all official vehicles of the party and government organs in Shandong will be equipped with new energy vehicles.

  Zhongxin. com, Jinan, October 11th (Sun Tingting) Shandong Province promotes the popularization and application of new energy vehicles in official vehicles of party and government organs, and ensures that by 2020, except for special work requirements, all party and government organs in this province are equipped with new energy vehicles. At the same time, clear requirements are put forward for office buildings of party and government organs, and idle office buildings are encouraged to be converted into public welfare places such as convenience services and community activities.

  On the 11th, Zhang Zhongming, director of the Administration Bureau of Government Organs of Shandong Province, at a press conference held by the People’s Government of Shandong Province, interpreted the Measures for the Administration of Office Buildings of Party and Government Organs in Shandong Province and the Measures for the Administration of Official Cars of Party and Government Organs in Shandong Province. Among them, the "Administrative Measures for Official Vehicles of Party and Government Organs in Shandong Province" clearly requires that party and government organs should be equipped with domestic vehicles, take the lead in using new energy vehicles, and gradually expand the proportion of new energy vehicles in accordance with regulations to achieve full coverage of new energy vehicles.

  Zhang Zhongming said that the Administrative Measures for Official Vehicles of Party and Government Organs in Shandong Province clearly stated that party and government organs and public institutions should equip vehicles and purchase all new energy vehicles except for special requirements. At present, the province has put 120 new energy vehicles into the provincial authorities, and built 261 charging piles and more than 40 charging piles under construction to ensure the orderly operation of self-service time-sharing leasing projects for new energy vehicles. "We have adjusted all the official vehicles planned by the provincial authorities at the beginning of the year to new energy vehicles. At present, some vehicles have been equipped."

  "Party and government organs shall not use the bus for private use or use the car for public use. If official vehicles or off-road vehicles are equipped beyond the prescribed standards due to work needs, they must be reported to the provincial official vehicle authorities for approval according to procedures. " Zhang Zhongming said that the Measures for the Administration of Official Cars of Party and Government Organs in Shandong Province clearly requires that the management standard system of official cars be improved and perfected, and the standards of exhaust volume and price of official cars should be classified and stipulated, and it is proposed that the standards of official cars should be adjusted in a timely manner according to the technological development of the automobile industry, market price changes and other factors.

  Wang Shoubo, a member of the Party Committee, deputy director and spokesperson of the Shandong Provincial Organs Administration Bureau, said that the Measures for the Administration of Office Buildings of Party and Government Organs in Shandong Province put forward the "export" of idle assets of innovative office buildings through multiple channels, and proposed six disposal and utilization methods, including cross-level adjustment and use, conversion of use to serve people’s livelihood, replacement with other assets that meet national policies and needs, unified lease, public auction and demolition, and opened up channels for adjustment between different levels and different systems to encourage idle office buildings.

  The Measures for the Administration of Office Buildings of Party and Government Organs in Shandong Province also clearly requires that office buildings should be used reasonably within the approved area, and should not be adjusted to other units without authorization, and the use function should not be changed without authorization. It also requires leading cadres to keep an annual record of their personal office buildings, not to use them beyond the standard, not to work in multiple places without authorization, and not to continue to occupy them after retirement.

Indian troops have crossed the border and have not yet withdrawn from our Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

       CCTV News:On the afternoon of July 6th, the Foreign Ministry of China held a regular press conference. According to reports, the Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement on June 30 that China’s recent road construction activities in Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border brought serious security risks to India. In response, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Geng Shuang said,It is legal and reasonable for China to build roads on its own territory, which is a legitimate act of sovereign countries.The Indian statement has ulterior motives.

       Geng Shuang said that according to the basic norms of international relations, India crossed the established border into the territory of neighboring countries on the grounds of its so-called security concerns, and no matter what activities it engaged in, it would not be tolerated by any sovereign country, let alone the normal way for two neighboring countries of China and India to get along. Geng Shuang called the so-called excuse that China’s road construction poses security risks to India ridiculous. In the past few decades, India has built a large number of facilities and deployed troops in the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border, and even built military facilities such as bunkers in some places, constantly changing the status quo in the border areas.I wonder if India has considered China’s security concerns in doing so?

Geng Shuang

Geng Shuang

       Geng Shuang pointed out that the purpose of India’s provocation is very clear, that is, under the pretext of so-called "security concerns" and under the guise of "protecting Bhutan", it brazenly crossed the Sikkim section of the border demarcated by the Tibet-India Treaty of the Sino-British Conference, entered the undisputed Donglang area of China, and stopped and contained the border negotiation process between China and two sovereign countries by creating disputes in Donglang area. I believe that more and more people will realize India’s ulterior motives.

       India’s unconditional withdrawal is the premise of diplomatic settlement.

       It is reported that Indian Defense Ministry officials said on July 5th local time that the current problems between China and India should be solved through diplomatic means. In this regard, Geng Shuang, a spokeswoman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said that China is willing to solve the problem peacefully through diplomatic means, but only if the Indian personnel crossing the border immediately and unconditionally withdraw to the Indian side of the border.

       Geng Shuang pointed out that the Indian border guards illegally crossed the established border of Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border, which was recognized by both sides, which was essentially different from the previous border friction confrontation in the undefined area: India crossed the border and broke into China, which changed the status quo. Only when India withdraws can the status quo be restored. China has the will to solve the problem peacefully through diplomatic means, and it also cherishes the peace and tranquility in the border areas, but the prerequisite for all this is the unconditional withdrawal of Indian cross-border personnel.

       [Link] Review the illegal cross-border incidents of Indian troops.

       In response to the illegal crossing of the border by Indian troops, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China has made clear China’s solemn position for several days, demanding that the relevant personnel of Indian border guards immediately withdraw from China’s territory. However, the Indian troops have not yet withdrawn. So, what is the illegal crossing of the Indian army? Let’s review it together.

       On June 18th, Indian border guards crossed the border into Chinese territory at the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border, obstructing the normal road construction activities of Chinese border guards in Donglang area of China.

       In 1890, the Sino-British Conference Tibet-India Treaty demarcated the Sikkim section of today’s Sino-Indian border. According to this treaty, Tibet and Sikkim are bordered by the watershed between the water flowing into the Sikkim Tista River and its tributaries and the water flowing into the Mozhu River in Tibet and flowing northward into other rivers in Tibet.

       On June 29th, China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lu Kang responded that according to the provisions of this treaty, Donglang area belongs to the territory of China, and the watershed of Indian troops crossing the border is very clear, which is an undeniable fact. The Indian army’s move violated the historical boundary and the commitments of successive Indian governments. Lu Kang also showed relevant evidence that Indian border guards illegally crossed the border this time. It can be clearly seen from the photos that Indian soldiers and vehicles crossed the watershed as the boundary line and entered China.

one

Indian soldiers and vehicles crossed the watershed as the boundary line and entered China.

       My Ministry of National Defense: I hope that the Indian army will not clamor for war.

       Shortly before the incident, Labat, chief of staff of the Indian Army, declared that India was preparing for the "2.5-line war", that is, to deal with the security threats of China, Pakistan and China at the same time. On June 30th, the Indian Defense Minister also threatened that "India today is different from India in 1962".

       Wu Qian, spokesman of the Ministry of National Defense, responded: "The remarks made by the Chief of Staff of the Indian Army are extremely irresponsible. We hope that individuals in the Indian army can learn from history and stop making such dangerous remarks calling for war. "

Wu Qian

Wu Qian

       Evidence proves that India has no objection to the boundary of Sikkim section.

       After the incident, the Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs made it clear for several days from three aspects: history, jurisprudence and local conditions that the division of the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border has long been clear, and Donglang belongs to Indian territory, and there is no dispute.

       On July 3rd, Geng Shuang, spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said: "In 1959, Indian Prime Minister Nehru said in a letter to Premier Zhou Enlai that the boundary between India’s protectorate Sikkim and China’s Tibet was determined by the British-Chinese Treaty in 1890 and jointly demarcated on the ground in 1895. There is no dispute about the border between Sikkim and Tibet. "

       On July 5, Geng Shuang reiterated that China reiterated that,India should immediately withdraw all border troops to the Indian side of the border line, which is the premise and basis for solving the current incident, so as to avoid more serious events and more serious consequences.